This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Collective, C.A.S.E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto

In the last decade, critical approaches have substantially reshaped the theoretical landscape of security studies in Europe. Yet, despite an impressive body of literature, there remains fundamental disagreement as to what counts as critical in this context. Scholars are still arguing in terms of ‘schools’, while there has been an increasing and sustained cross-fertilization among critical approaches. Finally, the boundaries between critical and traditional approaches to security remain blurred. The aim of this article is therefore to assess the evolution of critical views of approaches to security studies in Europe, discuss their theoretical premises, investigate their intellectual ramifications, and examine how they coalesce around different issues (such as a state of exception). The article then assesses the political implications of critical approaches. This is done mainly by analysing processes by which critical approaches to security percolate through a growing number of subjects (such as development, peace research, risk management). Finally, ethical and research implications are explored.

Key Words: critical theory • security studies • collective intellectual • sociology of IR

Security Dialogue, Vol. 37, No. 4, 443-487 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0967010606073085


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Burgess There is No European Security, Only European Securities Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 2009; 44(3): 309 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. McDonald Securitization and the Construction of Security European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2008; 14(4): 563 - 587. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. T.R. Wibben Human Security: Toward an Opening Security Dialogue, August 1, 2008; 39(4): 455 - 462. [PDF]

				M. B. Salter Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security Security Dialogue, April 1, 2008; 39(2-3): 243 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. Burgess Editor's Note Security Dialogue, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 545 - 546. [PDF]

				C. Sylvester Anatomy of a Footnote Security Dialogue, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 547 - 558. [PDF]

				c.a.s.e. collective Europe, Knowledge, Politics Engaging with the Limits: The c.a.s.e. collective Responds Security Dialogue, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 559 - 576. [PDF]

				R. Van Munster Review Essay: Security on a Shoestring: A Hitchhiker's Guide to Critical Schools of Security in Europe Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2007; 42(2): 235 - 243. [PDF]

				R. B. J. Walker Security, Critique, Europe Security Dialogue, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 95 - 103. [PDF]

				A. Behnke Presence and Creation: A Few (Meta-)Critical Comments on the c.a.s.e. Manifesto Security Dialogue, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 105 - 111. [PDF]

				M. B. Salter On Exactitude in Disciplinary Science: A Response to the Network Manifesto Security Dialogue, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 113 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]