Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Security Dialogue
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mythen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Walklate, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Terrorism, Risk and International Security: The Perils of Asking 'What If?'

Gabe Mythen

School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Liverpool, UK

Sandra Walklate

School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Liverpool, UK

In this article, we explore the ways in which cross-disciplinary theories of risk can enable us to grasp salient issues that arise out of the construction, assessment and regulation of terrorism in contemporary society. First, we demonstrate how risk society theory can be utilized to unpack the changing nature of terrorism. Second, deploying Furedi's work on the culture of fear, we show how the discourse of terrorism nestles into a broader politics of risk that is disproportionately directing economic and political policies and encouraging a climate of public anxiety. Third, utilizing the tools of the governmentality perspective, the linkages between measures designed to combat the terrorist threat and authoritarian domestic law and order policies are elucidated. We go on to analyse the contents and practices of the `war on terror', arguing that the offensive and pre-emptive strategies that it legitimates are wedded to a creeping shift in risk assessment from retrospective estimations of harm to an outlook based on futurity. It is posited that this shift ushers in a number of contradictions and dilemmas around the political deployment of discourses of risk.

Key Words: risk • terrorism • governance • security

Security Dialogue, Vol. 39, No. 2-3, 221-242 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0967010608088776


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
A. Crawford
Governing Through Anti-Social Behaviour: Regulatory Challenges to Criminal Justice
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2009; (2009) azp041v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
C. Aradau and R. van Munster
Exceptionalism and the 'War On Terror': Criminology Meets International Relations
Br. J. Criminol., June 12, 2009; (2009) azp036v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
G. Mythen, S. Walklate, and F. Khan
'I'M A MUSLIM, BUT I'M NOT A TERRORIST': VICTIMIZATION, RISKY IDENTITIES AND THE PERFORMANCE OF SAFETY
Br. J. Criminol., June 3, 2009; (2009) azp032v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
S. Elbe
Risking Lives: AIDS, Security and Three Concepts of Risk
Security Dialogue, April 1, 2008; 39(2-3): 177 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]