Security Dialogue

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collective, C.A.S.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Security Dialogue, Vol. 37, No. 4, 443-487 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0967010606073085

Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto

C.A.S.E. Collective

In the last decade, critical approaches have substantially reshaped the theoretical landscape of security studies in Europe. Yet, despite an impressive body of literature, there remains fundamental disagreement as to what counts as critical in this context. Scholars are still arguing in terms of ‘schools’, while there has been an increasing and sustained cross-fertilization among critical approaches. Finally, the boundaries between critical and traditional approaches to security remain blurred. The aim of this article is therefore to assess the evolution of critical views of approaches to security studies in Europe, discuss their theoretical premises, investigate their intellectual ramifications, and examine how they coalesce around different issues (such as a state of exception). The article then assesses the political implications of critical approaches. This is done mainly by analysing processes by which critical approaches to security percolate through a growing number of subjects (such as development, peace research, risk management). Finally, ethical and research implications are explored.

Key Words: critical theory • security studies • collective intellectual • sociology of IR


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
A. T.R. Wibben
Human Security: Toward an Opening
Security Dialogue, August 1, 2008; 39(4): 455 - 462.
[PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
M. B. Salter
Imagining Numbers: Risk, Quantification, and Aviation Security
Security Dialogue, April 1, 2008; 39(2-3): 243 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
J. P. Burgess
Editor's Note
Security Dialogue, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 545 - 546.
[PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
C. Sylvester
Anatomy of a Footnote
Security Dialogue, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 547 - 558.
[PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
c.a.s.e. collective
Europe, Knowledge, Politics Engaging with the Limits: The c.a.s.e. collective Responds
Security Dialogue, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 559 - 576.
[PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
R. Van Munster
Review Essay: Security on a Shoestring: A Hitchhiker's Guide to Critical Schools of Security in Europe
Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2007; 42(2): 235 - 243.
[PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
R. B. J. Walker
Security, Critique, Europe
Security Dialogue, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 95 - 103.
[PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
A. Behnke
Presence and Creation: A Few (Meta-)Critical Comments on the c.a.s.e. Manifesto
Security Dialogue, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 105 - 111.
[PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
M. B. Salter
On Exactitude in Disciplinary Science: A Response to the Network Manifesto
Security Dialogue, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 113 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]