This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jackson, N. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

International Organizations, Security Dichotomies and the Trafficking of Persons and Narcotics in Post-Soviet Central Asia: A Critique of the Securitization Framework

Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, UK

This article offers a constructive critique of the Copenhagen School's ‘securitization’ framework by applying it in an analysis of the role of international organizations seeking to counter the trafficking of narcotics and persons in post-Soviet Central Asia. The study discovers common and divergent motivations that explain international attempts and failures to securitize. In the case of human trafficking, significant clashes created obstacles to international efforts. In both cases, international organizations advanced their agendas through the language of security, but also through institutional changes and increased resource allocation. These processes led to the adoption of mostly traditional security strategies. The analysis concludes that although the securitization framework makes significant contributions as an analytical tool, its definition is too vague and it is too narrow in focus. ‘Security dichotomies’ need to be taken into account in a comprehensive analysis of why international attempts to securitize issues sometimes succeed and sometimes fail. The influence of rhetoric on the development of policy should also be taken into account if the securitization framework is to provide a complete understanding of the issues or be useful for policymakers.

Key Words: securitization • security dichotomies • Central Asia • narcotics trafficking • trafficking in persons

Security Dialogue, Vol. 37, No. 3, 299-317 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0967010606069062


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Roe Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures: Securitization and the UK's Decision to Invade Iraq Security Dialogue, December 1, 2008; 39(6): 615 - 635. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. K. Mohapatra Political and Security Challenges in Central Asia: The Drug Trafficking Dimension International Studies, April 1, 2007; 44(2): 157 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]