Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Security Dialogue
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neal, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception

Andrew W. Neal

School of Politics, International Relations and Philosophy, Keele University; University of Birmingham. a.w.neal{at}keele.ac.uk

This article offers a critique of the discourse that has emerged around the problem of ‘the exception’. ‘The exception’ is shorthand for the problem of certain events and situations, such as 9/11, being designated as ‘exceptional’ in order to legitimate exceptional policies, practices, executive measures and laws. The article terms this discourse and practice ‘exceptionalism’. It begins by identifying problems in the treatment of the exception and exceptionalism in the work of Carl Schmitt, Giorgio Agamben and securitization theorist Ole WÊver. A different theoretical approach to the problem of the exception is then offered, drawing upon Michel Foucault's early work, The Archaeology of Knowledge. The narrative focuses on the detail of Foucault's ‘archaeological’ methodology, relating it to specific problems in the political-theoretical discourse of exceptionalism. The reasons for an emphasis on ‘archaeology’ rather than Foucault's later ‘genealogical’ slant are explained. The article concludes by arguing that ‘archaeology’ – conceived as a neo-Kantian mode of critique that is discursive and historicist – is a more appropriate and less problematic method for engaging with the problem of the exception.

Key Words: Exception • Foucault • Schmitt • Agamben • securitization

Security Dialogue, Vol. 37, No. 1, 31-46 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0967010606064135


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
C. Aradau and R. van Munster
Exceptionalism and the 'War on Terror': Criminology Meets International Relations
Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2009; 49(5): 686 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
M. De Larrinaga and M. G. Doucet
Sovereign Power and the Biopolitics of Human Security
Security Dialogue, October 1, 2008; 39(5): 517 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]