This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KHRYCHIKOV, S. Articles by MIALL, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Conflict Prevention in Estonia: The Role of the Electoral System

Department of Politics and International Relations & Richardson Institute, Lancaster University, United Kingdom

HUGH MIALL

Department of Politics and International Relations & Richardson Institute, Lancaster University, United Kingdom

Estonia's success in averting a potential conflict over its Russian-speaking minority is often attributed to the intervention of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. Indeed, the Estonian case is one of the most satisfactory encounters in the period of Max van der Stoel's impressive diplomatic engagement. However, deeper, structural factors were also important over the longer term. In particular, the voting system that Estonia adopted, based on the single transferable vote system of proportional representation, turned out to be important in encouraging political moderation. This article argues that a decisive factor in ethnic accommodation was the way the political system channelled the activities of the Russian-speaking groups into Estonian parties. Other contributory factors were the weakness of ethnic identity among the Russian-speakers and international constraints on Russian foreign policy. This analysis highlights the crucial role of domestic institutions in conflict prevention.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?